Welcome aboard everyone! I hope you enjoy the next 2 months of post here and on Twitter ( handle is @VAN_DLL ). If you are already following, you know I am a field biologist, if you just started following, now you know. I recently started a Ph.D. at UMass, and now am heading off again into the wilds to start my latest field season. I hope I can share some of this world’s natural beauty with you and share my sense of wonder if things we encounter along the way.
This year I am heading off to the Scottish Highlands to study the majestic water vole. What is a water vole? I will tell you all about it in the posts to come, but needless to say it is an aquatic rodent. Think muskrat but smaller and cuter. What’s a muskrat? You are on your own there!
Although they can be a pest in some parts of Europe, the water vole is threatened in the UK. I will be telling you its story along side the story of the field work too.
There’s nothing like the field. Which is what I keep telling myself. As a 6’5″ person made mostly of legs, the upcoming overnight flight to Heathrow is a daunting and tight situation (for my knees at least). I know it’s going to be worth it, the field always is.
See you on the other side of the pond!
Today is a cross post from Dispatches From The Field! I am guest posting today and if you like this post, check out stories from other field researchers from across the world on their blog! It’s a great site! Thanks for letting me contribute.
This week, Dispatches from the Field is pleased to welcome guest poster Joseph Drake, a PhD student from the University of Massachusetts, who tells a nerve-wracking story about his time doing fieldwork on a military base in the Sonoran Desert.
I brought the truck to a gravelly sliding stop. A wave of dust washed past the truck and filled our open windows with fine sediment. When the dust and coughing settled, I got out of the truck, stepped gingerly on the 2-track “road” the military had bladed through this section of desert and looked at what lay before me. Tanks to the left of me, bombs to the right, here I am stuck in the middle with you. Wait, that’s not how the song goes. But it does do a fairly good job of describing our precarious situation.
Some background: I…
View original post 1,091 more words
I recently guest posted on Scientist Sees Squirrel, a great ecology blog run by Dr. Stephen B. Heard. So far it was has been a two part roller-coaster-type of affair (as far as science writing can be a roller-coaster-type of affair). Below are the links for both posts on Scientist sees squirrel followed by a snippet of both posts. Check them out and check out Stephen’s blog, it’s great!
“This is a guest post by Joe Drake, a PhD student in the Department of Environmental Conservation at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Joe’s own blog is The Secret Life of a Field Biologist, and you can email him at email@example.com.
Part I: In Which Our Hero Enters the Wilderness
Do you know what was one of the most stupid things I ever said I could do? Start and then finish an NSF proposal over the course of a winter break. My advisor and I sat down the day before leaving and hammered out a wonderful conceptual model for our project and eventual proposal. We created Google docs to work from. We were excited. We had a great idea. I said that I’d have a draft in two weeks. I was an idiot.
This isn’t the story of long-ago writing lessons. This isn’t the story of how I learned to write. This is the story of a couple of weeks ago and today. This is the story of how I’m learning to write. It’s a story full of failures. Some have already happened; many are yet to happen. Many readers may have already learned from their own versions of these, or maybe like me, they have just begun to encounter such challenges. Maybe my mistakes can help you along your writer’s journey*.”
Continue here: http://wp.me/p5x2kS-Dc
Image:The PhD monomyth. Compare with the monomyth narrative structure, the Hero’s Journey (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero’s_journey). Adaptation by J. Drake.
This is Part II of a guest post by Joe Drake, a PhD student in the Department of Environmental Conservation at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Part I is here. Joe’s own blog is The Secret Life of a Field Biologist, and you can email him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Part II: In which our hero returns…. “enlightened”?
Our story up to now: I am a student learning how to write (and to do science, which involves a batch of writing). I haven’t been very good at it, and I’m still not that great, but through valiantly misguided (misguidedly valiant?) efforts, I’m here telling you how I’ve started to get better. Perhaps this will help you too (for more details see part 1).
As a new grad student, I had just traded the world I had learned to know (as field biologist) for a brand new unknown. I landed myself in the middle of nowhere: Lubbock, Texas. Far from the areas I had done research. Far from anything but dust storms, cotton fields, and BBQ (hey, it wasn’t all bad).
I had a very constructive and supportive environment in the Dr. Griffis-Kyle Lab, and thus a soft landing into this unknown. My lab held writing group meetings and helped me develop good writing habitats alongside people willing to support them. They offered a helpful critique to enhance a well-executed bit or a hand when I fell flat on my face in failure.
My blog continued in bursts and fits and spurts. I tried (and still try, for that matter) to post regularly. I got into science outreach and communication and that lead me to try writing for even wider audiences. Then I got to participate in different types of seminars that pushed my comfort zones and let me explore the literary side of ecological writing. I got to present at the Sowell Conference and meet Barry Lopez and other great writers. I started delving into authors like David Quammen, Rick Bass, Peter Matthiessen, John McPhee, Stephen Jay Gould, and Charles Bowden. I was inspired and educated more deeply than I could have thought.”
Finish reading here: http://wp.me/p5x2kS-Dx
Thanks everyone and enjoy!
Hey ya’ll, check out this guest post of mine on a great ecology blog run by Dr. Stephen B. Heard.
From the trenches: How I’m learning to write (guest post) – http://wp.me/p5x2kS-Dc
Once I get back from a trip I will cross post the whole piece, but until then, enjoy it on Stephen’s blog.
SciComm is huge right now. Some people might even say tremendous.
[Sorry, inappropes, I know.]
There is a wealth of knowledge beginning to be produced and absorbed and applied about science communication. And the discussion that all of this is producing is truly a forward and positive direction for science practitioners. But, there’s a problem in the way many of my peers, other students, I have encountered are approaching it. They approach science communication like it’s a science. But it’s not*. I argue, especially after attending an interactive seminar on science communication by Dr. Tim Miller of SpokenScience.com, that by in large, science communication is an art (Art? GASP!).
We are trying to launch into it with methods and it just doesn’t do it justice. We need to know more of the theory behind it and more specifically, how communication feels. You can’t boil it down to an algorithm and as much as we want, we will never always get it right now matter how hard we try. Communication is a dialogue that gets people intrigued with what you have to say by making them emotionally invested as well. Sometimes someone just doesn’t care either through apathy or just plain having a bad day. although there are ways to ensure success even in the face of an “mentally escaping audience.”
Dr. Miller pointed out that the most important transactions in our lives are still generally done face-to-face. And I think this super important. In light of a social media rant from one of my friends, most people don’t know a scientist, or at least the don’t know they know a scientist. There is the #actuallivingscientist tag, but I think that the most effective way for scientists to make people more aware of science is through face-to-face contact. In the street, in the bar, at the grocery store, at a panel event, wherever. We should still do all those other things like blog posts and social media, and articles and interviews, but face-time is still the ♠.
Full disclosure, before I ended up in the trajectory I am in now, I was heavily involved in the theatre and got a dual degree in both Anthropology and Biology. The theatre and anthro really helped me gain an appreciation for narrative and the importance of the emotional, random, improvisational, and chaotic nature of effective communication. There are some books I read before I ever picked up a science communication book. The lessons gleaned from these helped me understand and retain the lessons I am relearning for my newest journey. Even if you have read every scicomm book there is, there is still reason to read these too. It’ll only help you get better.
Here is a list of some of my favorite books on communication:
- How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie
- My Dad, was a mechanic for the Air Force. But once he returned from Vietnam, basically decided to make his own schedule and from that point on has been successfully self-employed. As I was about to leave for college he told me to read this book, because “No matter where you work or who you work for, you will always be selling YOU. You must sell you in the interview, sell you in the day to day workplace, and sell you to your bosses, coworkers, and maybe eventually employees.” Great advice from a great man (although I am a bit biased on that one). If there is only time to read one book on this list, make it this one.
- The Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell
- Like Star Wars? How about Lord of the Rings? Maybe you like murder mystery instead? Well the thing they all have in common is the Hero’s Journey. Campbell was a visionary that described the monomyth and the underlying narrative structure of much of human storytelling.
- Wonderbook by Jeff VanderMeer
- His manual for creative writing is mainly geared for scifi & fantasy, but it is so wonderfully illustrated and informative (with exercises!) that this is a great tool for storytelling.
- On Writing by Stephen King
- A more general memoir on the craft of narrative. It’s kind of a classic.
- Poetics by Aristotle
- During the workshop, Tim mentioned that the idea of the realms of science and art being two separate worlds is a recently new phenomenon. But they didn’t necessarily start separated and don’t necessarily need to be now. Some of the forefathers of science were also the forefathers of art. This is a great example of that notion.
I hope this short list** of texts pull you out of your comfort zone a little. It will make you a better science writer to have these in the background and as resources. It will also give you some good context when you do start picking up scicomm books. Remember, it all fits in with the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (ecology nerd joke alert).
* I think, however, that there is actually great benefit to be gained out of this pursuit. We should study the idea and process scientifically***. But it isn’t the end all be all approach; it won’t get us all the way there. It can’t be truly understood through the process of science. Using a formula to assemble parts that have been derived from studying communication will only get you part of the way. It may work, but then again, it may fall flat on it’s head if the user can’t read an audience or hasn’t practiced or hasn’t….well you get the picture.
**I would also like to include The Elements of Style, Strunk ; On Writing Well, Zinsser; and Bird by Bird, Lamott, but you have to stop somewhere.
***After you have read the books in this list, I suggest using a great transitional book into science communication by Randy Olson named Houston, We Have a Narrative. Randy actually does wiggle out a fairly simple formula, and after I read this book, I found structuring my stories much easier.
My work here is done.
Hi everyone, just wanted to get the word out that a paper I co-wrote with Dr. Kerry Griffis-Kyle and Dr. Nancy McIntyre has been published in the ESA journal Ecosphere. I am really excited for this paper to get published, there is a lot of good info in here. It studies connectivity in the Sonoran Desert focusing on the mule deer and invasive bullfrog as a counterpoint. Some of my experiences and insights from the field and a lot of my Master’s thesis went into this work.
2017. Using nested connectivity models to resolve management conflicts of isolated water networks in the Sonoran Desert. Ecosphere 8(1):e01647. 10.1002/ecs2.1652, , and .
Its main message is that species across a variety of taxa with experience decreasing ability to move across the Sonoran Desert into the future as climate change changes the landscape. Increases in temperature, changes in vegetation, and drastic shifts in precipitation will increase the resistance that landscape will pose to animal movement. It will be harder for animals to travel in the desert, especially as fewer natural water locations such as seeps, springs, and rain fed waterholes dry up. The last point is crucial as these watery locations often hold a majority of biodiversity in the area and provide literal oases in the desert for local and migrating organisms. This is a big deal for management.
If you will forgive me the following jargon filled sentences, there are some secondary information that was important to consider too. We used network analysis and least-cost path analyses, and circuit theory to study connectivity of the desert. During the analysis, we discovered that the scale in which the analyses occurred significantly impacted the results of the connectivity analyses (well duh, right? See figure below). We developed a framework the suggests using structural analyses using network theory to identify areas inside of our full region connectivity analysis which to rerun all of the analyses over again on a more local scale, thus nesting a “local” scale analysis inside of the context of a region wide analysis. We felt this was a good way to approach the study and an innovative look at the use of connectivity analyses.
There are some surprising findings about which areas of the Sonoran Desert in the United States will provide refuge in the future too. But you’ll just have to read it to find that out. Check it out here (it’s open access so anyone can read it): http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.1652/full
Thanks for checking it out!
I believe in science. I trust it’s facts, it’s ability to be replicated; it’s ability to be put to the test.
I also believe in art. I trust that it is sometimes unmistakably unknowable. I know it makes me feel.
If we have learned something from recent world events, it is that the way we feel about a thing sometimes is more important than what we can observe as truth.
My point is science and conservation in this day and age needs to make people feel something. They have to believe in it.
For example, what do you remember from remember BBC’s Planet Earth or Life documentaries? Do you remember many of the facts from them? ANY of the facts in them? I have watched them a couple times, and what I remember is the feeling the images evoked. The awe, the wonder, the excitement, and yes, even sadness. Those documentaries were art; they made me feel – and that’s what I remember.
Photos, videos, presentations, popular books, other media, and getting people involved are useful tools that can help spur people to feel about science. I know I am not writing anything new here. However, sometimes we forget that our words (as they are interpreted via media outlets) make people feel things.
Much of climate change science suggests scary things: species extinction, economic collapse, disease spread, sea level rise, etc… From different fields associated with biological conservation, we hear news reports of emerging diseases, biodiversity collapse, and disappearing species we love. And don’t get me wrong, much of this is scary, with dire implications. But that can’t be the only conversation we have (with the public), because if it is, no one will want to talk to us.
I understand the scary things make good headlines. But I think that there is good work being done that shows scientific results that make people feel wonder and happiness too. I don’t expect every scientist to be able to do outreach let alone a BBC documentary, but I feel like there are things we could do that would help on a local scale. Instead of aspiring to be a Neil deGrasse Tyson of your field and floundering with expectations, actually become the Neil deGrasse Tyson of your lab, department, or community.
Most scientists I have encountered are creative, curious people. Otherwise they probably wouldn’t have become scientists, those are kinda prerequisites for the job. I know that in my immediate lab, it contains a woodworker, silversmith, 3 different musicians, a graphic designer, and brewers (don’t judge me for thinking a good beer is art, because it is).
Having been steeped and surrounded in my field for so long, I can no longer remember what it is like to encounter my type of work for the first time. I don’t know if someone would be engaged, encouraged, discouraged, scared, or what there impression would be. I do know that I have participated in interdisciplinary art shows that engage audiences to think about the world around in a distinctly scientific mindset. And this was in Lubbock, Texas, so I may state it could be possible anywhere. After listening to people in the exhibit hall, I heard things like, “I never really thought about that.”, “Oh, that’s pretty.”, “I like that.” It wasn’t anything fancy, but it did demand that people interpret a rarely acknowledged resource in a new light. It was instructional to hear people’s feelings about the science-come-art abstractions. It was insight into how they perceived the world around them, specifically the parts of the world I cared about too.
I guess what I want from people is to cross some boundaries (again, nothing new, but come on, when was the last time you did?). Not just across the university or with another state agency or what not, get into some seriously new territory. Work with the theatre department to have them teach communication and presentation skills to young scientists. Reach out to your local art gallery and see if they would host an installation by scientist/artists in your university. Use your photography skills to make nature more accessible so that people care more about a local piece of land that protects species and ecological services that they never new existed. Publish a zine about fieldwork or local natural resources conservation issues in conjunction with an undergrad or high school English class and a local bookstore. Have a second grade class help create a sculpture that can be put in said parcel of land, that also doubles as wildlife habitat (think funky birdhouse installation or whatever you can come up with), or artificial coral reef that they could go and snorkel to and count coral recruitment. Meet with the local rotary, give a presentation, ask for venues to display work. Contact local sportmans’ clubs and see if they have any projects that could benefit both parties (river clean up? Use the trash to create that art installation or figure out if they have land you can use for a research project in return).
If we have enough people start reaching out and engaging locally, whether it is as simple as a social media post of cute wildlife or as complex as involving local NGOs and elementary schools in citizen science and restoration, we can start getting people to feel good about science. When people start feeling good about science, when what they think about conservation isn’t scary world-ending, species-disappearing headlines, we can get them to care. Otherwise a lot of people will just though up their hands and walk away. Even if someone don’t understand a particular topic, we need them to linger, to believe, and to ultimately have trust, like we have, in this adorable monster we call science.
P.s. I may be completely wrong. I often am. But at least, I think we should try. I think it may just be worthwhile.
As you are sitting around at home surrounded by family getting ready for the dreaded Thanksgiving Dinner conversation with extended family that may or may not share your world views, and you are thinking “What am I gonna do for holiday gifts?” or maybe not, but I think you should consider the following [toolongdon’twannareadspoilers: buy park passes and donate to conservation advocacy groups, see below for suggestions and links]….
As you are trying to find common ground across the stuffing this Thanksgiving, remember that most of the people sitting there care about the lands, lakes, and woods (or deserts or mountains). They just may use different language to show their passion about the environment. That Uncle of yours that voted a way you didn’t like (whether it was Hillary, Trump, or 3rd party; hey but at least he voted) has probably donated more to conservation this year through hunting license purchases and taxes on his recreational equipment than you have given your entire life.
Most people care about the environment; either you do in a preservation-stand-back-and-look-at-it-way or a conservation-get-your-hands-dirty-sometimes-mess-things-up-but-doing-something-way or a my-folks-have-been-here-doing-things-this-way-type or way.
Instead of going out for Black Friday or buying things for your family likes socks and sweaters and knickknacks and other random stuff I have a couple of suggestions that can actually be liked by the people you are gifting them too, do the environment a solid, protect public access to public lands, and make you feel good.
- Get them a National Park Pass – common, everyone loves the parks.
- Get them a pass to their local state park.
- g. Indiana: http://stores.innsgifts.com/ ; Texas: http://tpwd.texas.gov/state-parks/park-information/passes
- Also if you want to spend black Friday outside, many of them will free entrance this year on Black Friday
- Give a gift or subscription in their name to a conservation advocacy group:
- Care about protecting our public lands heritage? Donate in their name to the Teddy Roosevelt Conservation Partnership (Common, everyone loves Teddy too!): http://www.trcp.org/donate/index.html#.WDchhbIrLIU
- Care about wilderness? Give them a gift subscription to Backcountry Hunters and Anglers: http://www.backcountryhunters.org/join
- Want to be a little combative about it? Go ahead, get them a subscription to Sierra Club: https://vault.sierraclub.org/ways-to-give/
- Do they like to fish (do you like eating fish and drinking clean water?) Get them a gift membership to Trout Unlimited: https://gifts.tumembership.org/member/gift_membership
- See if the State you live in has magazine for the department of natural resources or game and fish organization: e.g. Arizona – https://www.azgfd.com/Media/Magazine ; Indiana – http://www.in.gov/dnr/9329.htm ; Texas – https://www.tpwmagazine.com/ ; Massachusetts:
- Ask them to take you fishing or hunting, offer to buy the next year’s license for that particular activity, and learn something from each other (please?). Seriously though, a lot of the funds for conservation programs and habitat restoration that happens in your state probably comes from the sale of hunting and fishing licenses and those tax dollars I mentioned. This goes for nongame species and habitat too!
- Check out your state wildlife/park agency for more details: e.g. Indiana –http://www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/5330.htm
So I hope this gives you some holiday ideas. It means you can avoid Black Friday. It means you can put your money where your mouth is (a lot of these things aren’t that expensive), and it means you can have some impact for conservation. It also means you have an opportunity to open a dialogue and become a part of the solution, instead of being part of a division. And here is the even sappier message: you might just learn something new too. Happy Thanksgiving people. Hope you have safe travels and delicious food.
Now, if you search on Twitter you can find some really cool ecological field work related posts using tags like #fieldworkfail and #fieldworkwin. Tons of them actually. But they capture the essence of a moment in time. I wanted something that encompassed the essence of the thing you find in field work. This developed from a a week on a the Lower Colorado helping a buddy of mine do some search and recovery of his data loggers after a big rain and flood event in Texas. We found all types of crazy things thrown up on shore from the flood waters. Everything from the ubiquitous plastic water bottle to stoves to fishing poles to old department store mannequins and styrofoam heads to entire kayaks and even a small boat in one particular spot. So while on the water, completely disconnected from the digital world, I thought of the hashtag #fieldworkfind(s). I thought I was so clever, but when we I hit the internet later that week, low and behold it already existed.
Now, to be fair, there are not that many uses of the singular or the plural. And from here I would like to steal it for my own purposes. I define #fieldworkfind to be a hashtag for those unexpected discoveries in the field. Not necessarily actually pertaining to your field of study, but those odd ball finds out in the middle of the woods. I know these things are supposed to develop on their own but, low hanging fruit! For example: while out and about on the river we came across a styrofoam head, half eaten away by flood and boring insects. That bobbing along the water, in the middle of nowhere, is a field work find. More examples: that ’49 Chevy skeleton with the wildflowers growing out of the engine block in the middle of a wilderness area; a license plate in the stomach contents of a shark; or a . Another one of my favorites is the creepy half destroyed doll out where no child should be able to make it, like halfway up a sheer cliff.
So calling all field work finds of the wondrous, creepy, exciting, weird, and just plain out-of-place things we see out there in the hinterlands. Because sometimes science is just plain weird.
Exciting news for me, a new study I am a coauthor on is in press!
It is titled, “A connectivity and wildlife management conflict in isolated desert waters” and is really interesting! Seriously! I am excited because it helps shed some light on little known landscape features and how they impact connectivity for wildlife. It is also a teaser to more work that I am preparing for publication right now. Check back for updates on that.
Get it electronically at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.1059/abstract
or check out my research gate profile to request it if you don’t have access to the journal.
And if you are at this year’s IALE conference in Asheville, NC, come find me! I will be giving a talk related to this paper at 10:40 on Tuesday in the connectivity section. Hope to see you there!